Home ~ Sample Wedding Ceremonies ~ Readings & Poems ~ Our Philosophy
Thank You's ~ New York State Marriage License Info ~ FAQ ~ Contact ~ Fees  
Articles ~ Newsletter ~ Site Map ~ Empire State Building Valentines Day
Weddings  ~  Long Island Wedding Reception & Ceremony Locations
Wedding Rings: 2800 B.C. Egypt
by Charles Panati

The origin and significance of the wedding ring is much disputed.  One school of
thought maintains that the modern ring is symbolic of the fetters used by
barbarians to tether a bride to her captor's home.  If that be true, today's double
ring ceremonies fittingly express the newfound equality of the sexes.

The other school of thought focuses on the first actual bands exchanged in a
marriage ceremony.   A finger ring was first used in the Third Dynasty of the Old
Kingdom of Egypt, around 2800 B.C.  To the Egyptians, a circle, having no
beginning or end, signified eternity-for which marriage was binding.

Rings of gold were the most highly valued by wealthy Egyptians, and later
Romans.  Among numerous two-thousand-year-old rings unearthed at the site of
Pompeii is one of unique design that would become popular throughout Europe
centuries later, and in America during the Flower Child era of the '60's and '70's.  
That extant gold marriage ring (of the type now called a friendship ring) has two
carved hands clasped in a handshake.

There is evidence that young Roman men of moderate financial means often went
for broke for their future brides.  Tertullian, a Christian priest writing in the
second century A.D., observed that "most women know nothing of gold except
the single marriage ring placed on one finger."  In public, the average Roman
housewife proudly wore her gold band, but at home, according to Tertullian, she
"wore a ring of iron."

In earlier centuries, a ring's design often conveyed meaning.  Several extant
Roman bands bear a miniature key welded to one side.  Not that the key
sentimentally suggested a bride had unlocked her husband's heart.  Rather, in
accordance with Roman law, it symbolized a central tenet of the marriage
contract: that a wife was entitled to half her husband's wealth, and that she could,
at will, help herself to a bag of grain, a roll of linen, or whatever rested in the
storehouse.  Two millennia would drag on before that civil attitude would
reemerge.