Home ~ Sample Wedding Ceremonies ~ Readings & Poems ~ Our Philosophy
Thank You's ~ New York State Marriage License Info ~ FAQ ~ Contact ~ Fees  
Articles ~ Newsletter ~ Site Map ~ Empire State Building Valentines Day
Weddings  ~  Long Island Wedding Reception & Ceremony Locations
Diamond Engagement Ring: 15th Century Venice
by Charles Panati

A Venetian wedding document dated 1503 lists "one marrying ring having
diamond."  The gold wedding ring of one Mary of Modina, it was among the early
betrothal rings that featured a diamond setting.  They began a tradition that
probably is forever.

The Venetians were the first to discover that the diamond is one of the hardest,
most enduring substances in nature, and that fine cutting and polishing releases its
brilliance.  Diamonds, set in bands of silver and gold, became popular for betrothal
rings among wealthy Venetians toward the close of the fifteenth century.  Rarity
and cost limited their rapid proliferation throughout Europe, but their intrinsic
appeal guaranteed them a future.  By the seventeenth century, the diamond ring
had become the most popular, sought-after statement of a European engagement.

One of history's early diamond engagement rings was also its smallest, worn by a
two-year-old bride-to-be.  The ring was fashioned for the betrothal of Princess
Mary, daughter of Henry VIII, to the dauphin of France, son of King Francis I.  
Born on February 28, 1518, the dauphin was immediately engaged as a matter of
state policy, to assure a more intimate alliance between England and France.  
Infant Mary was presented with the veriest vogue in rings, which doubtless fit the
tiny royal finger for only a short time.

Though the origin of the diamond engagement ring is known, that of betrothal
rings in general is less certain.  The practice began, though, well before the
fifteenth century.

An early Anglo-Saxon custom required that a prospective bridegroom break some
highly valued personal belonging.  Half the token was kept by the groom, half by
the bride's father.  A wealthy man was expected to split a piece of gold or silver.  
Exactly when the broken piece of metal was symbolically replaced by a ring is
uncertain.  The weight of historical evidence seems to indicated that betrothal rings
(at least among European peoples) existed before wedding rings, and that the ring
a bride received at the time of proposal was given to her again during the wedding
ceremony.  Etymologists find one accurate description of the engagement ring's
intent in tis original Roman name,
arrhae, meaning "earnest money."

For Roman Catholics, the engagement ring's official introduction is unequivocal.  
In A.D. 860, Pope Nicholas I decreed that an engagement ring become a required
statement of nuptial intent.  An uncompromising defender of the sanctity of
marriage, Nicholas once excommunicated two archbishops who had been involved
with the marriage, divorce, and remarriage of Lothair II of Lorraine, charging them
with "conniving at bigamy".  For Nicholas, a ring of just any material or worth
would not suffice.  The engagement ring was to be of a valued metal, preferably
gold, which for the husband-to-be represented a financial sacrifice; thus started a
tradition.

In that century, two other customs were established: forfeiture of the ring by a
man who reneged on a marriage pledge; surrender of the ring by a woman who
broke off the engagement.  The Church became unbending regarding the
seriousness of a marriage promise and the punishment if broken.  The Council of
Elvira condemned the parents of a man who terminated an engagement to
excommunication for three years.  And if a woman backed out for reasons
unacceptable to the Church, her parish priest had the authority to order her into a
nunnery for life.  For a time, "till death do us part" began weeks or months before
a bride and groom were even united.